flag image
Lake Geneva Chiropractic

Hummel land on sale for $22.4 million



HUMMEL_map_BIG
shadow
Geneva Ridge is in the yellow area, the entire area is on sale for $22.4 million. This area has been the focal point for debate for several years.

shadow
shadow
April 18, 2012 | 08:39 AM
It's apparently over.

Plans for a huge development south of Lake Geneva are apparently dead — at least any plans led by Geneva Ridge, communally known as Hummel.

Yes, the debate that has dominated Lake Geneva politics for much of the last four years, the one that led to lawsuits in excess of $100 million, appears to be over at least in terms of the Hummel group.

They've decided to sell the 710-acre property. The price tag: $22.4 million.

According to Michael Mooney, representing the group, they're simply tired of fighting and find selling the logical next step.

It had appeared that plans for development might move forward based on events that occurred last summer. Then the Lake Geneva City Council approved a change in its master plan that would have allowed for development. That controversial decision was made on the eve of a deadline in the lawsuit that had plagued the city for years. It also came in the wake of a presentation by a Hummel attorney in support of the change.

A few weeks later Hummel and the city settled with the city's insurer, paying the developer $2.1 million to end the case.

By the end of 2011 the city had settled with Mirbeau, another player in the development project, for $1.75 million.

All that seemed to point toward a new push by Geneva Ridge to develop the area.

So what happened to change the developer's plans?

Mooney, who is chairman and principal of MLG Commercial, a commercial real estate company located in Brookfield, said the decision to sell the property came after Geneva Ridge officials mulled over their project since last year's events.

After the uproar and the lawsuits of the last few years, Mooney said, Hummel executives decided to sell instead of continue with a development. Mooney compared it to a divorce. "You're not likely to go into business with your ex-wife," he said, paraphrasing a Hummel executive. "They're done fighting."

Mooney made the rounds last Friday to announce his company's plan, dropping in on the Regional News and city hall where he met with City Administrator Dennis Jordan.

"I want to be transparent," Mooney said, in explaining his visit. "I don't want there to be any surprises," Mooney alluded to the long-standing controversy over the property. "I want people to know what's going on before they see the for sale signs popping up."

The property is what Mooney calls "an assemblage of nine parcels." He wants to make sure people realize part of the value of the property is that they're contiguous. Mooney, who said he'd worked with similar parcels in the past, said it can often take years to buy up such a large tract of land. We "may" divide it he said, emphasizing the word "may." Even if they did sell parcels, he said, every effort would be made to keep as many parcels contiguous as possible.

Mooney said future land owners would be responsible for working with the city to obtain appropriate zoning should that be necessary.

Mooney said he became involved in the project after attending city council meetings on the subject. During a hearing he spoke before the council. Mooney said was perplexed by the city's decision making process at the time. He accused the council of listening more to Linn residents than those from Lake Geneva."

Mooney said he had no financial connection with Hummel at the time of his comments to the council.

A sales brochure touted the land as having "gently rolling hills, fabulous vistas, oak savannahs and picturesque wetlands."

However, there's been nothing gentle or picturesque about the controversy the property engendered the last few years. It started when Geneva Ridge proposed a development that would include 883 residential units, a 100-room inn/spa, and a winery. The project was short-circuited when the city council decided to reject the idea following a referendum, and the lawsuits followed. For a timeline, see related story.

When asked for a comment, Lake Geneva Mayor Jim Connors replied in an e-mail that "Mr. Mooney notified staff in person last week that the property was being put on the market. We appreciated Mr. Mooney keeping us informed, but offer no comment regarding the listing or property in general."

A group called Care for Lake Geneva issued a press release, saying: "With the news of Geneva Ridge Joint Venture's plans to abandon the development of the property and put it up for sale, local residents can breathe a temporary sigh of relief."

"We are excited to learn that Geneva Ridge will abandon its plan to develop the property and put the property up for sale." says Casey Schiche, a Lake Geneva resident and president of the group. "A majority of voters and residents opposed this project due to the dramatic impact it would have on our community and our lake and we are glad that our voices have finally been heard but we remain concerned about what may be proposed in the future. The plans for the Hummel property were just not in the best interests of the city of Lake Geneva."

"With the for sale sign soon to be up on the property, the community needs to be more vigilant than ever to ensure the property is developed in a responsible manner so that local property values are protected and the lake is not threatened by development of the property," the press release said.

"We understand that this land may be developed some day but it must be developed in a responsible manner which includes open space preservation and consistency with the character of the Lake Geneva community," Schiche said.

Other city officials or those tied to the long-term controversy chose not to respond or could not be reached by press time.

printPrint
emailEmail
CommentFeedback
shareShare

Tags: Top of page

  1. report print email
    Not good
    April 18, 2012 | 04:38 PM

    So who is going to buy land that the City of Lake Geneva and its elected officials have gone to great lengths to make worthless.

    No one is going to want land that you cannot develop.

    Lake Geneva
  2. report print email
    April 18, 2012 | 05:46 PM

    "No one is going to want land that you cannot develop." - sad, but true. Lake Geneva thrives off of tourism - like it or not. If stuff like this keeps up, and we can watch the town dry up. Can we afford to in this economy?

    Discouraged
  3. report print email
    April 19, 2012 | 10:51 AM

    I love our community the way it is. The monstrosity that was being planned would have decimated precious green space and had a negative impact on our lake. Lake Geneva does not need to become like Wisconsin Dells in order to thrive (no offense to Wisconsin Dells of course). There are a myriad of more responsible ways to develop that land that will balance the needs of the community and our obligation to protect green space and the watershed.

    Thrilled Resident
    Lake Geneva
  4. report print email
    It's a shame
    April 19, 2012 | 06:06 PM

    Well, I think they made a Big Mistake even starting the whole Process of Building a project like this, in the 1st place..

    The whole Geneva Lake Area has been in a Major Slump even before 08' and Ever since..

    The Towns and Communities are All but Baron, closed up 6-8 mos of the Yr.. And things are So Slow and Streets Empty 5 days a week, it's Pitifull

    and are Surrounding Towns as well..

    Of course, what you expect ? When What % of the Homes are Owned by Non Residents and Are Summer Places! Closed up 6-8 mos a Yr.. and thus the business Drops accordingly..

    What has Been the occupancy rates for our Current Hotels and Resorts the past 4-5 yrs? Dismal I would Guess..

    and to build such a Big Project like this? Is just foolish.. It would be a Ghost Town 6-8 mos a Yr..

    I know my Subdivision is and has been for yrs!

    ;-(


    Retired
    LG
  5. report print email
    Hummel
    April 20, 2012 | 06:43 AM

    Every time the property has some movement to development, all the anti development signs go up in the back yards of many extremely wealthy lakefront owners property. The are several who financially could easily purchase the property with to make sure it is never developed. Don't put up the signs, put up your money, keep it open land forever!

    Local Resident
    Linn
  6. report print email
    April 23, 2012 | 07:19 PM

    "Lake Geneva does not need to become like Wisconsin Dells in order to thrive"...It doesn't need to become like Wisconsin Dells, but it does need to offer NEW tourist attractions, or Lake Geneva will dry up. Lake Geneva has already become kind of stale. Don't get me wrong, I was born and raised in the area, and I love coming back to visit - but coming from someone who has lived outside of the Wisconsin/Chicagoland area for some time, there really isn't that much to do when compared against other vacation destinations. Like it or not, Lake Geneva thrives on tourism. If there are no new attractions, you can expect things to get a whole lot worse! Maybe this particular project didn't please locals, but the mindset of continually prohibiting any development in the Lake Geneva area will be detrimental to the area's future.

    Discouraged
Walworth County Fair
Site Search

Pick up The Lake Geneva Regional News at these convenient locations
Lake Geneva Chiropractic
Community Bank
Saturday
05 - 25 - 13
07:40
Search the Net