flag image

Council removes staff assessor



shadow
shadow
January 12, 2011 | 09:02 AM
A third City Council vote regarding the city's assessor meant bad news for Grace Lininger.

On Monday, the council voted 6-2 in favor of removing Lininger, the current assessor who has worked for the city for more than 21 years.

Instead, the city will contract with Accurate Appraisals, a firm which will act as an independent contractor providing assessment services. Although there was no discussion Monday night prior to the removal of Lininger, aldermen previously stated the issue had nothing to do with Lininger's work. Elected officials stated it was all about cost savings for the taxpayers of the city of Lake Geneva.

Also, according to city officials, Lake Geneva was one of the few municipalities which still had an on staff assessor. Most municipalities contract with an assessor for yearly work and revaluations.

However, some officials voiced concern about not having someone in the office or readily available by phone.

City Attorney Dan Draper said Monday night part of the contract with Accurate Appraisals, which is located in Appleton, includes office time at City Hall and telephone availability to property owners at no additional cost to the city.

Lininger was not at City Hall Tuesday morning for comment on her removal. City Administrator Dennis Jordan said she called him earlier and said she did not need to come in because she didn't have anything at City Hall she needed to pack up.

With salary, benefits and other costs related to the office of the assessor, the cost to the city has been more than $90,000 per year. In 2005, the total was the most at $101,483. This past year, the wages for the assessor total $60,136, add in $17,913 for health insurance, $15,850 for other costs and the total was $93,899.

According to numbers provided by staff, the city will save $18,906 in the first year, by contracting with Accurate Appraisals.

The saving in the second year would be $40,961. The final two years, it would be $50,399 per year and that same amount each year after. That would mean the total saving for the four-year contract would be $160,665.

In the fifth year, the cost would be between $35,000 and $40,000. The city would be saving at minimum $53,899 per year starting the fifth year and have a 100 percent valuation each year.

However, Alderwoman Mary Jo Fesenmaier, who voted against Lininger's removal all three times, including Monday night, previously said she didn't believe a city employee should be removed without talking about it with staff. She also said last month she believed those savings numbers aren't up to date. Alderwoman Arleen Krohn also voted against the removal Monday.

Last month, the Regional News obtained a letter Lininger penned on Nov. 18 to the mayor and the council. In it, she stated a taxpayer informed her in April she was being replaced. She wrote that "no one from the city has approached me about being replaced or how to possibly cut costs in the department."

Lininger wrote that she has been a city resident since 1971 and taxpayer since 1977, stated she has been a dedicated employee for more than 21 years. She stated in the letter she was willing to make some adjustments in order to keep her position. She stated she would eliminate her health insurance, which would save the city $17,000; negotiate a possible wage reduction and eliminate $6,500 for help performing the commercial appraisals.

The letter has not been discussed in detail at any council meeting or during considerations of Lininger's removal.

However, Jordan said Tuesday he has discussed the possible removal with Lininger.

On Nov. 22, four days after the letter was written, the council voted 5-2 in favor of removing the staff assessor. Six votes are needed to remove the appointed position. It was the second time a similar motion failed. During the Dec. 13 meeting, the council agreed to again reconsider removal of Lininger.

printPrint
emailEmail
CommentFeedback
shareShare
  1. report print email
    Grace
    January 12, 2011 | 09:47 AM

    Grace was very professional to deal with and I appreciate her efforts.
    Thank you Grace!!!
    Good luck

    taxpayer
    Lake Geneva
  2. report print email
    January 12, 2011 | 10:07 AM

    This appears to be another mistake or rush to judgement made by city council members who have no sense of history for the community. Yes, Grace Lininger worked hard for a long time, in a difficult position for the city she lives in and because of her dedication she had been rewarded over the years for her performance as all good employees expect of their employers. Then to have that illustroius carreer ended so abruptly and crudley without any talk of concessions or compromises speaks volumes about the powers that be that have no or few ties or history with this amazing community.

    It is people and families like Grace Lininger that have lived in, raised families in, supported and helped nurture Lake Geneva. I understand the reason for this, "money", but I don't understand the calous process. Shame on you City Council members that voted for this change without exhausting all possible avenues to avoid it, although Grace herself had offered some on her own.

    I no longer live in Lake Geneva having been gone for over 10 years but my family and friends remain and because of my 40 plus years there I will always consider it home. Issues like this makes me realize what sad times we are all in. My gratitude goes out to Grace Lininger for her years of service to this community and I wish her well in the future.

    Randy Gustafson
  3. report print email
    The way it should be
    January 12, 2011 | 01:37 PM

    "I understand the reason for this, "money", but I don't understand the calous process."

    The process is not only the way is should be, but the was it has to be. Government's first concern should be to make sure that the taxpayer's dollars are being spent in the most efficient and effective way possible. If they were to take into consideration every individual, we'd never have budget cuts, salary freezes, layoffs, or positions eliminated. I'd hate to think what our tax rate would be then.....

    Enough Already
    Lake Geneva
  4. report print email
    the city counsel doesnt care about one person if political press
    January 12, 2011 | 08:01 PM

    Grace offered to make concessions to make up the difference, they werent interested in listenting. Easy target to ruin one person's career. Why dont they outsource the administrator or city planner? Lake Geneva routinely disregards compassionate pleas and defies common sense. They have one focus, listen to Hennerley who has been there way past his prime, keep the downtown busy, fund low paying tourism jobs, and ignore the rest of us. In order to keep someone like Grace they would have to make changes in their good ole boy, business as usual approach. Sorry Grace, you are probably better off somewhere else anyway. Probably should sue them, it seems like the only way they pay attention.

    long time LG resident
  5. report print email
    Incompetent city officials strike again…
    January 13, 2011 | 09:14 AM

    How is that you can vote three times until you get your way? Does it mean that our aldermen are accepting bribes under the table in order to get what they want for their votes. “Change your vote this way and I’ll give you what you want in return.” Obviously we know that politicians are corrupt so this comes as no surprise in what we are dealing with. The last time I checked when you voted for something the vote was final…that was the vote!!! You just don’t get to keep voting until you get what you want! It’s a shame they had to use somebody like Grace as an example to the community to show their incompetence. I agree with the last post, maybe they should think about outsourcing the city administrator job which makes twice as much, or outsource the whole city government. It couldn’t be any worse than what has been happening lately for this city. I think she should jump on board and sue them as well although she will have to wait in line with everyone else that is suing the city for their incompetence.

    Concerned Taxpayer
    Lake Geneva
  6. report print email
    concerned taxpayer, lake geneva
    January 13, 2011 | 09:00 PM

    While we are at it, how bout outsourcing the attorney. He makes enough, although we have never had more expensive issues, and I believe the former was his partner in the same firm I understand? Why do we have him, if we keep getting sued? Isnt he supposed to be protecting us from risk? Perhaps we should look at return on investment on each staff member's salary, Grace brought in revenue, others decisions or lack of pre-emptive action have gotten us sued. I am beginning to wonder, who really are the most expensive employees?

    long time LG resident
  7. report print email
    January 14, 2011 | 11:39 AM

    I surely hope a well defined bckground check was performed to compare the QUALITY they are loosing to price of quality that they are selling out to...sorry to say Lake Geneva...it won't be just a declining market that is going to kill the values in your City now...you may be saving some monies up front but just wait for the bank roll of taxable value fly out the window....

    you get what you pay for
  8. report print email
    Why not ask the Aldermen
    January 16, 2011 | 07:51 AM

    Mayor and all other city officials to take a 50% pay cut to help ease the burden? They didn't seem to to concerned to let the Assessor go and take the money away from the planning commission. Show some real concern and vote a 50% pay cut of your own pay. After all it is for the good of the city in these hard times.
    Also did I hear right on the Committee of the Whole where Mr. Krause said he was working in Chicago. What's up with that? Can't earn enough in this fine land of Lake Geneva? We have to go to Chicago to earn fair pay while we scream about keeping things the same here. It says something doesn't it.

    Skeptical
  9. report print email
    Skeptical
    January 16, 2011 | 03:03 PM

    Why should you care where he works at? The bigger cities is where the money is. So if you want to be a " Do you want fries with that"? kinda person good for you.

    Local Resident.
  10. report print email
    local resident
    January 16, 2011 | 06:04 PM

    skepitcal has a point there. Maybe if he and the rest of the counsel would allow business to come in he wouldn't have to go to the big city to make better money. Get it? We need better paying jobs and more jobs in this area. Use your head instead of your keyboard.

    Local Resident Which One?
  11. report print email
    So Local Resisent (which One)
    January 17, 2011 | 06:29 AM

    What you are saying is that you need to work in the city you live in? He choose to work in Ill. for the money and spend it in LG. I do agree that LG needs more business but for the city of its size there are plenty of businesses.

    Local Resident
  12. report print email
    To Local Resident (Which One)
    January 17, 2011 | 06:32 AM

    What businesses have the city refused to allow into the city? Also why are they not allowed in>

    Local Resident
  13. report print email
    local resident
    January 17, 2011 | 06:58 AM

    It is not the number of businesses really but the number of quality paying jobs these businesses create. How many of the businesses in Lake Geneva are mom and pop and they can only support themselves and maybe 1 or two others? Not a lot of jobs for the number of people needing work. Remember it isn't just having a job, but being able to earn a fair living to survive too. Also look we lost Trostel a large enough company, the group who lost Hillmoor were denied their plan and let us not for get the 25 year plan by Mirabeau/Hummel lost. There have been plenty of business ideas brought here and voted down. Now for the alderman who went to work in Chicago. All we hear is how great it is to be here then why is there the need to go 100 miles to Chicago and work. If life is so great here and good jobs are plentiful then there should be no need for a public official to work elsewhere. That tells me he knows this area is declining otherwise he wouldn't need to seek work elsewhere.

    Local Resident Which One?
  14. report print email
    My head is ready to explode
    January 17, 2011 | 09:49 AM

    Reading some of these posts. My god people, of all the things that council members do that would be legitimate areas to criticize, where a person works is not one of them. While I agree that the city has done little or nothing to attract business to the area, let's be honest, at best we still couldn't compete with the wages that one can make working in Chicago. It also amazes me that some people think that Hillmoor's golf course or the "new spa & resort" at Mirabeau/Hummel somehow constitute "good paying jobs". Try filling out an application at one of the current spa/resort/golf courses in the area and you'll find out they're FAR from good paying jobs, unless you count $.50 above minimum as good paying. If you want jobs that people can make a living at, then you need to attract INDUSTRY not another hoytee toytee resort. I'm also stunned at the number of people who seem to think that because we eliminated a position in city government that suddenly everything will go to hell and people will be getting the screw job on assessments. Makes me wonder how many of these people are basing this on facts or just friendship with the person who lost their job?

    Enough Already
    Lake Geneva
  15. report print email
    Local resident and Skeptical
    January 18, 2011 | 10:33 AM

    Good points. Read the Economic development study that was independently funded and conducted in 2007 for Walworth County. It confirms your beliefs and says some of the major barriers to economic development our the sense of Parochialism (we dont want you here), people's concerns for change or threat to their quality of life. This study also says Quality of Life is often cited in many of these studies, so this is not a unique attribute to our area. Go to WCEDA website look up the job demographics yourself. The average wage in our county lags behind the average wage in WI and surrounding Counties in almost every employment sector except hospitality which is the lowest paying sector and also the largest amount of employees. Also this study points out that in the last 10 years the largest increase in numbers of jobs has been in the lowest wage sectors. This is not a recession issue people, this is a planning issue. Our population is increasing at a quicker rate than the state, exceeding the wage trend. The city of LG has over 40% reduced or free lunch enrollment in schools. This has been a trend that has been increasing steadily since 2000. See a problem here? Do you know what happens when you have a growing low income population? Decreasing tax base? You have increased demand on Municipal services and less revenue to pay for it. Read Dave Bretls comments in the County budget, he is warning you all about this.

    Bottom line people, we do need to increase our tax base here, and a great way to do it is to attract better paying jobs. Lake Geneva has a beautiful downtown area with nice shops, and we know they are doing a good job marketing to consumers to spend in those shops when we see the line of traffic backed up to Hwy 12, but this will not pull us out of this rut people. Are the products sold in the shops produced here? Wisconsin has one of the lowest sales tax rates in the Country. Get educated.

    Walworth County Resident carrying my fair share
  16. report print email
    Didn't Mary Jo and Arlene Vote Against
    January 19, 2011 | 11:49 AM

    annexing Grand Geneva into Lake Geneva and would that not have brought much needed revenue into the city?

    Can someone help me out here, not sure if I have my facts straight here or not.

    And if they voted against it, can someone tell us why?

    Fed up
  17. report print email
    fed up
    January 19, 2011 | 01:59 PM

    the grand geneva is in lyons township. The town of lyons already gives about $250,000 of thier room tax revenue to the city tourist bureau

    taxpayer, lg
  18. report print email
    fed up
    January 19, 2011 | 01:59 PM

    the grand geneva is in lyons township. The town of lyons already gives about $250,000 of thier room tax revenue to the city tourist bureau

    taxpayer, lg
Regional News
Site Search

Pick up The Lake Geneva Regional News at these convenient locations
Lake Geneva Chiropractic
Community Bank
Wednesday
05 - 22 - 13
06:48
Search the Net