flag image
Form Wealth Management

Despite cloudy future, Bay School Board to plan ahead



shadow
shadow
March 09, 2011 | 08:32 AM
Williams Bay — A $600,000 deficit is burning a hole in the district's pocket, and the actual effects of Gov. Walker's budget and repair bills are unknown, but the School Board is still planning.

Despite or because of all of the uncertainty surrounding the public schools, now is the time to get options down on paper, said Superintendent Fred Vorlop.

"None of us know where this is headed," he said in a telephone interview Monday. "There are a lot of twists and turns in the road."

Plan to assist

The plan will assist the School Board in making decisions, even as the financial future of the district slips and slides with promises in Madison of budget cuts and no tax increases, Vorlop said.

Included in the unknown effects are the budget legislation, which would cut state aid to school districts by no more than 10 percent, but also drop districts' revenue caps by about $550 per student. According to budget language the revenue cuts will equal 5.5 percent per student.

For Williams Bay schools, that could amount to the loss of $350,000, in addition to the $600,000 deficit, Vorlop said.

Despite the uncertainty, one thing is for certain: it still takes money to run a school district.

Even with its current projected budget shortfall for next school year, Williams Bay is facing either repairing or replacing the elementary school for $8.5 million, or $10 million, or $11 million or $12 million, and possibly another $2 million on top of that.

ad
click to see advertisement
And then there's the standard 20-year high school roof replacement for $1 million.

New elementary school?

Neither of those pricey items will happen right now.

But they are just down the road.

The new high school roof is scheduled to be considered in 2015. Meanwhile, the School Board is tackling the issue of a new or renovated elementary school, starting now.

A referendum to raise the funds for the elementary school would occur in 2012 or 2013, with actual construction occurring in 2013 or 2014.

Maybe.

Other physical plant improvements in the proposed plan include replacing or upgrading the high school building's heating system, sometime between 2013 and 2015.

Vorlop said everyone thinks of the junior/senior high school building as being new.

And it is relatively new.

ad
click to see advertisement
But the school was built in 1995, and its electrical and heating systems have a life expectancy of 20 years, he said.

Replacement of those would cost about $2 million.

Other improvements would include upgrading the athletic field with a baseball diamond in 2013 with $320,000 in community service money, (already in hand); and upgrading the acoustics and expanding the seating in the high school lecture center in 2018 or later, cost unknown.

The first step to all of this, however, will be approving the plan in the first place.

Balance the budget

Superintendent Fred Vorlop, who presented the proposed long-range plan to the School Board Feb. 22, said the board will probably finalize the long-range plan in mid-April.

With that kind of financial hit possibly in the works, it seems appropriate that one of the first goals in the long-range plan is to achieve a balanced budget for 2011 and thereafter.

That may well mean cutting teachers and programs in the next year. Seven teachers, representing 4.6 full time equivalents, have already received preliminary nonrenewal notices from the School Board.

Administration staff might fall from 2.8 to 2 FTEs sometime between 2011 and 2015 and cutting maintenance staff from 3 FTE to 2.2 or 2 in 2011.

But the district will have to ask the voters for long-term funding support for 2011 and beyond, probably through a referendum.

And that means improving and maintaining communications with voters.

Improve communication

The plan proposes creating a school and community communications committee in 2011 to keep district residents in the loop about the schools.

Proposed for the period 2012 to 2016 is establishment of triennial written surveys or focus groups of residents to determine community views and the status of local education.

The plan also calls for more ways to involve residents in school-based programs, for example, through expanded fitness programs.

Starting in 2012, the district will begin to review consolidation options, comparing the costs and benefits of consolidation with those of maintaining the district.

All along, the district will try to maintain its programs and quality of education, even as it tries to find ways to fit its other costs into a constricting flow of revenue.

Academic goals include:

- Expanding student participation and success on college entrance exams sometime between 2011 and 2018.

- Pursue alignment of the schools' curriculum with mandated skills tests.

- Target 100 percent student proficiency in reading and math on state assessments for 2012 to 2018.

- Find ways to expand high school tech college offerings, foreign languages and the arts.

- Target 100 percent graduates to pursue post secondary schooling.

New technology

The trick with expanding academic programs is that everything else is contracting, Vorlop said.

"The truth is, we're hanging on by our fingernails now to hold on to what we have," he told the School Board in February.

Finally, the plan looks at new technology, such as SMARTboards or similar classroom electronics, and the plan also looks for federal dollars to help pay for those upgrades.

"The problem you have with technology is you need someone who can come in and fix that stuff," Vorlop said back in February. "Still, technology is the future of education."

printPrint
emailEmail
CommentFeedback
shareShare
  1. report print email
    March 11, 2011 | 08:45 PM

    The first priority for this school board needs to be consolidation with neighboring districts. The mere thought of upwards of $10 to $12 million or more for a new grade school makes this taxpayer shudder in disbelief. How about consolidating with a neighboring district and converting the WB high school into an elementary grade center and selling off the old elementary school land (given the building is likely beyond repair and should simply be demolished)? The thought of the WB schools planning on spending millions is just wrong given all that is going on at both the state and local level. FIgure out a way to consolidate before you tax us out of The Bay once and for all....and this from an out of state property owner (like many others!) that does not even utilize the local schools but pays dearly for them with our property taxes.

    Cedar Point Park Taxpayer
    Williams Bay
  2. report print email
    Tired of Cedar Park
    March 12, 2011 | 05:20 PM

    The firset order of the School District is for the School Board to realize that the people they need to represent are the children of the school district. They have been taking their marching orders from the NO people who largely live in big, beautiful houses in Cedar Point Park.

    Mary
    Williams Bay
  3. report print email
    out of state taxpayers
    March 12, 2011 | 09:17 PM

    Then why don't you stay out of state ?

    In state taxpayer
    Delavan
  4. report print email
    Let's be fair...
    March 14, 2011 | 06:07 PM

    I think seniors who care about the economy and the national deficit should volunteer to return at least a quarter of their social security payment each month to the government. And...since public employees got no notice of the reduction in benefits until two weeks before their pay checks were reduced, it'd also be nice if all the seniors would start donating back those funds as of March 16. And women who never worked their entire lives and are just living off the social security of their husbands should give up all their social security. And you don't get to complain... because when the governor speaks, we should listen.

    Fair is Fair
    Williams Bay
  5. report print email
    Let's be fair...
    March 14, 2011 | 06:07 PM

    I think seniors who care about the economy and the national deficit should volunteer to return at least a quarter of their social security payment each month to the government. And...since public employees got no notice of the reduction in benefits until two weeks before their pay checks were reduced, it'd also be nice if all the seniors would start donating back those funds as of March 16. And women who never worked their entire lives and are just living off the social security of their husbands should give up all their social security. And you don't get to complain... because when the governor speaks, we should listen.

    Fair is Fair
    Williams Bay
  6. report print email
    Let's be fair...???
    March 14, 2011 | 07:33 PM

    Aer you a government employee? Maybe a teacher that works 171 days a year, gets paid a YEARLY salary then whines when asked to contribute to your own healthcare and pension plans like the rest of the workers in the USA? I am not a senior (yet) but for the most part those people CONTRIBUTED a portion of their pay to get what they have coming. By the way, it was the majortiy of taxpayers that put the governor in office based on his platform of fiscal reform.

    A "Fair Man" in Genoa City
  7. report print email
    Fair is Fair
    March 15, 2011 | 07:21 AM

    That's a joke. My guess is you're a pouty public employee , but as long as the topic came up, how about....

    We raise the retirement age for public from 55 to 62 for partial benefits and 65 for full benefits.

    We calculate the benefit amount not on your highest 3 years salary (like in the case of the teachers) but on a formula that uses years worked and amount paid in to come up with a predetermined amount.

    If that doesn't work for you, perhaps....

    Completely eliminate the public employee state funded pension and have them contribute to social security and their own 401k plans.

    Afterall...

    What's fair is fair.....


    Enough Already
    Lake Geneva
  8. report print email
    Out of stat taxpayer resentment?
    March 16, 2011 | 09:21 AM

    I have to laugh at the comments made by Mary and In State Taxpayer. If that is the case then maybe all the tax dollars we out of state property owners pay into your local schools and government bodies should be greatly reduced given we do not use the schools. How do they take marching orders from the NO people when we cannot even vote in the local elections on issues that have tremendous impact on our tax bills? Realize that a significant portion of the local school budget comes from out of state property owners who do not even have a local voice when it comes to elections, referenda, and the like. If the assessed value of Cedar Point Park homes were removed from the Williams Bay school district tax levy the local district would be in a far greater financial bind than they are already. It is about time they listen to the concerns of all property owners/taxpayers as well as learn to exist within the constraints of their budgets as well as take the steps for much needed school consolidation.

    Cedar Point Park Taxpayer
    Williams Bay
  9. report print email
    Fair et al
    March 16, 2011 | 10:46 AM

    I have a better idea! How about those who are collecting social security - but don't need the funds (those with retirement accounts or investments of substantial means) are allowed a TAX CREDIT equal to the amount of social security they WOULD be entitled to but don't actually have to take it and get to charge it off against the retirement pension taxes the State imposes and against capital gain taxes that the federal gov't imposes?

    And I agree - school boards are supposed to be there for their "consumer's" - the children of the taxpayers. Sometimes you have a parent & teacher who are filling two stakeholder roles. Also,
    I personally know families that have taken the social security payment even though they had more than enough investments to fund their retirement and they give it to children and grandchildren. I don't blame them - its their $$ - but why not offer this as a solution. It may even extend the social security fund beyond the predicted life expectancy it has now.

    Jane Taxpayer
  10. report print email
    Enough Already
    March 16, 2011 | 10:56 AM

    Your quote " Completely eliminate the public employee state funded pension and have them contribute to social security and their own 401k plans."

    There are only 14 states that exempt teachers from social security contributions and Wisconsin isn't one of them.

    http://www.cga.ct.gov/2006/rpt/2006-R-0547.htm

    "WHICH STATES EXCLUDE TEACHERS FROM SOCIAL SECURITY?

    Fourteen states do not provide Social Security coverage for teachers. These states have so-called “independent” retirement systems for teachers and, in some cases, other public employees.
    The 14 states with independent retirement systems for teachers are: Alaska, Maine, California, Massachusetts, Colorado, Minnesota, Connecticut, Missouri, Illinois, Nevada,
    Kentucky, Ohio, Louisiana, & Texas."

    I've read this so many times and knew it didn't apply to Wisconsin so I finally decided to get it out there. I don't disagree with your analogy in part though...SWIB (State of Wisconsin Investment Board) who oversee's the state pension for everyone but Milwaukee - has done a pretty lousy job with the funds they have entrusted to them, but they gave themselves (the directors et al) a nice increase in wages anyway. I'd much rather allow public employees to take their money where they want to invest it - collect it by all means - but let the free market money managers who compete for your money manage it. My private investment manager is kicking butt! Even in this crappy economy. SWIB has been losing ground for years .

    PE
  11. report print email
    OK
    March 17, 2011 | 10:42 AM

    Allow me to rephrase....

    Completely eliminate public employees state funded pensions and have them rely on social security and their own 401k plans....

    Enough Already
    Lake Geneva
  12. report print email
    ENOUGH ALREADY!
    March 18, 2011 | 04:52 PM

    WHY ARE YOU SUCH A CLOSED MINDED, ANGRY, UNCOMPROMISING HUMAN BEING? I WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE PEACEFULL DEBATE FROM YOU SINCE YOU ARE COMMENTING ALL THE TIME. PRES. REAGAN SAID ONCE ( IF YOU TAKE AWAY UNIONS, YOU TAKE AWAY FREEDOM) CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT? ITS TRUE.

    -EVERMORE-
    L/G
  13. report print email
    Evermore
    March 19, 2011 | 02:25 AM

    Try taking the cap lock off, it defeats the purpose if all your words are capitalized. As for Ronald Reagan, that would be the same person who fired the air traffic controllers, right? Actions speak louder than words and that pretty much sums it up. As for the rest of your pablum, try taking a look at the garbage being spewed by union supporters. To hear them talk, you'd think they were nothing more than slaves. Sorry, I have a hard time finding sympathy for people who have it good but take every effort to try and convince the rest of us how hard they have it. If things are that bad in their cushy government job, quit and find something else. Problem is that will never happen because the dirty little secret is it's a good gig. I'm tired of having to make sacrifices in my budget because my property taxes go up every year because government employees think we owe them. I'm tired of seeing friends who have businesses having to find ways to cut back while government keeps on spending. Finally, I'm tired of people like you criticizing those of us who voice our opinions that don't fit into someone's preconceived notion of what's civil. If you want to harp about being peaceful, try conveying that to those "peaceful" people making death threats....

    Enough Already
    Lake Geneva
  14. report print email
    Enough Already,
    March 19, 2011 | 04:01 PM

    The caps were left on because sometimes I speak loudly. If you think old RONNY was in charge of that decision your wrong. I know that conventional education teaches us that, but that's not the case. I'm sure you have some knowledge on that given the fact that they don't deny that anymore.As for the union members, they are not trying to convince you how hard they have it, they are fighting for the very thing that we deserve,including you. Yes you. I'm sure you have worked hard over the years to build a life for yourself, well so have they. Ok they went the union route but what that represents are rights, a fair decent wage, work safety and equality, health care. It is the way it should be for everyone on this earth. Why can't we all live well and prosper together? If we all stood together union and non union against the globalist elite and demanded our fair share of the riches on this planet we would all be happy, everyone. Doesn't that somewhat fit into your idea of what is civil? As far as the death threats go there is always going to be some that are off there rocker, you can't control that. I've been to the capital numerous times during the protests and there has been no chaos like the mainstream media would have you believe.I even had my kids there just as many others did. For all we know those threats could be real, false, or done by republican antagonist to discredit the protesters. It does happen in these situations.

    -EVERMORE-
    L/G
  15. report print email
    EVERMORE
    March 21, 2011 | 07:13 AM

    Ok- I support the rights to peaceful protests - I do believe you are correct in that nuts are on both sides of this argument - look at the freak who shot the senator. He was a republican (tea party) screwloose.

    However - I would NEVER bring my children to a protest rally. First - because the nuts are out there - they are not confined or constrained by the majority of peaceful protestors. If you as an adult wish to take this chance - go ahead. But seriously consider what you are exposing your children too. I've seen video clips of children in strollers for pete's sake. Are you going to seriously tell me that those kids have any clue to what this is about for the parent pushing the stroller?

    I have other concerns about the teenagers who are marching in circles too. While they may have a better understanding of the issues, you can bet that they are getting it in the classroom at least 80% of the time. I have a HUGE problem with that. That's a one sided discussion just based upon self interest. I understand that - don't get confused - I do understand that peoples wallets are affected here. But those same children marching and the ones pushed in the stroller - are going to be paying for our choices as taxpayers for the past few years.

    Doyle took what he needed to keep the 2/3 funding committment. Well - he's out now. We have no place left to steal (oops I mean creative accounting transfer) from. The same people who will be taxed for whatever benefits are STILL being given will be saving themselves some tax dollars. Think of it as recycling your own money.

    I'm in the boat with you here - I'm a public employee. I don't want my children to start out in their personal lives with massive (or even minor) debts. That's why I saved for their college education - I got it covered. I don't want my children paying for our spending now either - same concept. Lets get ahead of the game here.


    Recycling
  16. report print email
    God, where to start....
    March 21, 2011 | 11:19 AM

    1) Does it really matter who decided to teach the air traffic controllers a lesson? The point was it was a lesson that needed to be taught, mainly that the unions don't dictate to us, we dictate to them.

    2) This recent battle in Madison had NOTHING to do with fighting for what's deserved, it had EVERYTHING to do with power. Guess what, even with the budget repair bill, those poor union folks are still getting a good wage and better benefits that most. What they objected to was this bill took away their ability to bully local taxing bodies. Their argument that they agreed to pay more for those benefits is a total joke. The unions knew (and would never admit) that as long as the rules of collective bargaining didn't change, they could simply wait it out till a new administration took office then "bargain" those giveaways back and then some. Not much of a "sacrifice" is it?

    3) Just where does the mindset come from that anyone OWES you anything? Where does the mindset come from that you're ENTITLED to a share of what others have? It doesn't matter whether it's a small business or a huge corporation, as an employee, you agree to do a job and in return, they agree to compensate you (salary, benefits, etc.). It is NOT your God given right to anything else. It simply amazes me the arrogance of some people to think that they somehow deserve "a share of the profits". If you want a bigger piece of the pie, either put yourself in a position to be more valuable to your employer or become the employer. Start a business, take the risk, put in the work required to make it a success. I'll bet you'll be a lot less sympathetic when people think their entitled to more of the pie when it's YOUR PIE.

    4) The death threats were done by a Republican Antagonist? Really? Really? WHat is it with lefties and their conspiracy theories? First it's the Koch brothers, then it's the Republicans making the death threats against their own people. Time to take the tin foil hat off and get a grip on reality.

    Enough Already
    Lake Geneva
  17. report print email
    Enough Already
    March 21, 2011 | 11:37 AM

    You will never convince an "entitlement mentality" that they are not really entitled to whatever it is they want. After all, their Queen, Nancy Pelosi and the King, Obama, want us to "redistibute" our wealth...hmmmm, maybe we ought somehow put that word into the repair bill title? It could be something like "Budget Redistribution Bill" since they don't want to share in the recession, this would be warmer and fuzzier - how could they object to it.

    Anyway, I'd like my wealth to stay with me thank you very much.

    You get an "a" for effort - but a liberal entitlement mentality will never be swayed.

    Jane Taxpayer
Regional News
Site Search

Pick up The Lake Geneva Regional News at these convenient locations
Community Bank
Lake Geneva Chiropractic
Monday
05 - 20 - 13
02:36
Search the Net